mesowatch
HomeAppeals Court Rules Against Companies in Asbestos-Related Wrongful Death Suit
divider

Appeals Court Rules Against Companies in Asbestos-Related Wrongful Death Suit

PA court house building

A Pennsylvania appeals court has ruled against Crane Co. and Warren Pump Co. in a wrongful death mesothelioma lawsuit involving asbestos-lined parts used on a U.S. Navy ship. The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with the lawsuit, overturning a lower court’s summary judgment award to the companies.

The lawsuit, filed in 2019 by Joyce Korol, executor of Thomas Phillip’s estate, alleges that Phillip developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure during his 28 months aboard the U.S.S. Dahlgren. Crane and Warren Pump argued that there were no direct eyewitnesses to Phillip’s exposure to their products, hence the claims against them should be dismissed.

However, the appeals court disagreed, stating that Korol presented enough evidence to create a material issue of fact regarding Phillip’s contact with the defendants’ products. The court emphasized that direct eyewitnesses are not necessary for asbestos litigation, and circumstantial evidence, such as the presence of asbestos in the workplace and the frequency of exposure, suffices.

Korol’s case relied on the testimony of sailors who worked aboard the U.S.S. Dahlgren, including David Anthony Warren, Gene Brown, and Charles Clay. While direct evidence of Phillip’s exposure was limited, the sailors’ testimonies provided circumstantial evidence supporting Korol’s claims.

The appeals panel referenced the 1988 case of Eckenrod v. GAF Corp., highlighting the standard set by the state’s high court regarding asbestos litigation. According to this standard, reasonable inferences can be drawn from circumstantial evidence in cases involving asbestos exposure.

With the summary judgment overturned, the case will proceed to further proceedings in the lower court, allowing Korol to pursue her claims against Crane and Warren Pump.

The ruling by the appeals court signifies a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over asbestos-related illnesses. It underscores the importance of considering circumstantial evidence in such cases and ensures that plaintiffs have a fair opportunity to seek justice for asbestos-related harms.

Johnathan Edwards

Reading Time: 1 mins

Published On: February 15, 2023

Johnathan Edwards - author

Johnathan Edwards Is a husband, father, veteran and medical writer, from the state of California. After serving 9 years in the U.S Army Medical Department, John cultivated his passion for serving his country and helping people. He often volunteers with helping to rehabilitate veterans of all ages. After John’s father was diagnosed with Mesothelioma, he began to research, write and fight for ways to help other victims of asbestos exposure.

More to Read

Section Divider

Katie Duquette - December 20, 2024

The Asbestos Lawsuit Process: From Diagnosis to Legal Action

Mini Divider
Mesowatch Logo

Mesowatch serves as an industry watchdog and advocates for patients and families affected by asbestos by providing reliable and up-to-date news stories and information on asbestos and mesothelioma.

NAVIGATE

About UsEditorial GuidelinesNewsSupport and ResourcesPrivacy PolicySitemap

CONTACT US

Email: support@mesowatch.com

Phone: (866) 402-1000

Address: 3260 N Hayden Rd, Suite 210, Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Copyright © 2024 by Mesowatch. All Rights Reserved.
At Mesowatch, we strive to provide helpful information for your journey. Please remember that the content on our website is for informational purposes only and is protected by copyright law. It is not a substitute for professional medical or legal advice. We encourage you to consult qualified professionals for any health or legal concerns. Disclaimer