mesowatch
HomeNJ High Court Skeptical Of Union Carbide Asbestos Verdict
divider

NJ High Court Skeptical Of Union Carbide Asbestos Verdict

court in.new jersey

In a high-stakes legal battle that could redefine manufacturers’ obligations in warning employees about asbestos exposure risks, the New Jersey Supreme Court engaged in a probing debate on Wednesday. The case, spearheaded by widow Thomasenia Fowler, challenges a lower court’s decision to grant a new trial to Dow Chemical unit Union Carbide over her husband’s mesothelioma death.

The crux of the matter revolves around whether manufacturers can fulfill their duty to warn workers by providing information solely to their employers. Fowler’s attorney, Amber R. Long of Levy Konigsberg LLP, argued vehemently against this notion, emphasizing the manufacturer’s inherent obligation to provide direct warnings to foreseeable users of the product.

However, Justice Anne M. Patterson raised questions about the existing legal precedent, suggesting that manufacturers may indeed fulfill their duty by conveying information to employers. Long countered this argument, asserting that allowing information provided to employers to replace direct warnings to employees would undermine the fundamental duty to warn.

Union Carbide’s attorney, Michael A. Scodro of Mayer Brown LLP, defended the appellate decision, citing the Supreme Court’s previous recognition that discharging the duty to warn sometimes necessitates communication through the employer.

The debate intensified as Justice Barry T. Albin highlighted the importance of direct communication with employees, citing the jury’s finding that the warnings on Union Carbide’s asbestos bags were inadequate.

The Supreme Court’s forthcoming ruling in this pivotal case has far-reaching implications for manufacturers’ responsibilities in ensuring workplace safety and protecting employees from hazardous substances like asbestos. As the legal saga unfolds, the balance between corporate accountability and worker protection hangs in the balance, awaiting the court’s decisive judgment.

Johnathan Edwards

Reading Time: 1 mins

Published On: January 19, 2022

Johnathan Edwards - author

Johnathan Edwards Is a husband, father, veteran and medical writer, from the state of California. After serving 9 years in the U.S Army Medical Department, John cultivated his passion for serving his country and helping people. He often volunteers with helping to rehabilitate veterans of all ages. After John’s father was diagnosed with Mesothelioma, he began to research, write and fight for ways to help other victims of asbestos exposure.

More to Read

Section Divider

Amna Anees - November 17, 2024

CHMP Recommends Pembrolizumab and Chemo for Pleural Mesothelioma

Mini Divider
Mesowatch Logo

Mesowatch serves as an industry watchdog and advocates for patients and families affected by asbestos by providing reliable and up-to-date news stories and information on asbestos and mesothelioma.

NAVIGATE

About UsEditorial GuidelinesNewsSupport and ResourcesPrivacy PolicySitemap

CONTACT US

Email: support@mesowatch.com

Phone: (866) 402-1000

Address: 3260 N Hayden Rd, Suite 210, Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Copyright © 2024 by Mesowatch. All Rights Reserved.
At Mesowatch, we strive to provide helpful information for your journey. Please remember that the content on our website is for informational purposes only and is protected by copyright law. It is not a substitute for professional medical or legal advice. We encourage you to consult qualified professionals for any health or legal concerns. Disclaimer