mesowatch
HomeStudy Suggests Chemotherapy Outperforms Surgery
divider

Study Favors Chemo Over Surgery in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Eric Lim | Professor of Thoracic Surgery | Royal Brompton Hospital

A new UK study challenges the standard treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma, suggesting that chemotherapy alone may be more effective than surgery combined with chemotherapy. Historically, maximal surgical cytoreduction with chemotherapy has been the norm, aiming to improve survival by removing as many tumors as possible.

The Practice-Changing MARS 2 Trial

The MARS 2 trial, a randomized study across 26 centers, tested this surgical approach. 335 patients with resectable pleural mesothelioma were assigned to extended pleurectomy/decortication followed by chemotherapy (169 patients) or chemotherapy alone (166 patients).

Contrary to expectations, patients receiving only chemotherapy had longer median survival (24.8 months) compared to those undergoing surgery plus chemotherapy (19.3 months). This survival advantage was consistent across various analyses and subgroups.

Worse Survival with Surgery

The restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis showed a significant survival benefit for chemotherapy alone, particularly in the non-epithelioid subgroup. Surgery was associated with higher rates of serious adverse events and poorer quality of life.

Progression-Free Survival: Comparing patients treated with chemotherapy alone (blue) and those who had surgery plus chemotherapy (red), showing similar outcomes.
Overall Survival: Patients receiving only chemotherapy (blue) lived longer on average than those who underwent surgery plus chemotherapy (red).

Increased Risks, No Benefit from Surgery

Surgery resulted in 3.6 times more serious adverse events compared to chemotherapy alone, and economic analyses found it to be not cost-effective at any willingness-to-pay threshold.

Dr. Eric Lim, the lead author, noted, “Extended pleurectomy decortication was associated with worse survival to 2 years, and more serious adverse events for individuals with resectable pleural mesothelioma, compared with chemotherapy alone.”

Balanced and Robust Trial

The trial’s strengths include balanced baseline characteristics and consistent results across the study period, mitigating potential reporting bias despite the unblinded design.

Paradigm Shift and Practice Implications

The MARS 2 results suggest chemotherapy alone may be preferable to aggressive surgery for many mesothelioma patients. Treatment guidelines may shift, limiting surgery’s role to clinical trials.

As the authors concluded, “Extended pleurectomy decortication and chemotherapy were associated with worse survival, more serious adverse events, poorer quality of life, and higher costs compared with chemotherapy alone.”

By emphasizing the superiority of chemotherapy alone in terms of survival, adverse events, and cost-effectiveness, the MARS 2 trial provides compelling evidence for reevaluating the role of surgery in treating mesothelioma.

Jean Brannum

Reading Time: 1 mins

Published On: May 28, 2024

Jean Brannum - author

Jean Brannum is a science writer who enjoys researching and discussing disease and cancer treatments. She recently graduated from NC State with a degree in biology and a focus in science journalism.

More to Read

Section Divider

Katie Duquette - December 20, 2024

The Asbestos Lawsuit Process: From Diagnosis to Legal Action

Mini Divider
Mesowatch Logo

Mesowatch serves as an industry watchdog and advocates for patients and families affected by asbestos by providing reliable and up-to-date news stories and information on asbestos and mesothelioma.

NAVIGATE

About UsEditorial GuidelinesNewsSupport and ResourcesPrivacy PolicySitemap

CONTACT US

Email: support@mesowatch.com

Phone: (866) 402-1000

Address: 3260 N Hayden Rd, Suite 210, Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Copyright © 2024 by Mesowatch. All Rights Reserved.
At Mesowatch, we strive to provide helpful information for your journey. Please remember that the content on our website is for informational purposes only and is protected by copyright law. It is not a substitute for professional medical or legal advice. We encourage you to consult qualified professionals for any health or legal concerns. Disclaimer